Ravulizumab

(Ultomiris®)

Ultomiris®

Drug updated on 3/28/2024

Dosage FormInjection (intravenous; 300 mg/30 mL)
Drug ClassComplement inhibitors
Ongoing and
Completed Studies
ClinicalTrials.gov

Indication

  • To treat paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria in adults and pediatric patients one month of age and older.
  • To treat atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in adults and pediatric patients one month of age and older.
  • To treat atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in adults and pediatric patients one month of age and older.

Summary
This AI-generated content is provided without warranty and may be inaccurate or outdated; it should be used only as a research starting point, with no liability accepted for reliance on it. Learn more.

  • Ravulizumab (Ultomiris) is used to treat paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in adults and pediatric patients one month of age and older.
  • Three systematic reviews/meta-analyses were reviewed, providing insights into the safety, efficacy, financial burden, biomarker associations with interventions, role of genetic mutations in prognosis for ravulizumab treatment.
  • The first review found that both eculizumab and ravulizumab are comparable in terms of safety and efficacy; however, ravulizumab was preferred by patients due to its lower financial burden and less frequent dosing schedule.
  • Soluble complement 5b-9 (sC5b), especially when present in urine samples could potentially be used as a biomarker to assess response to treatment with Ultomiris according to the same study.
  • Genetic mutations such as those affecting complement factor I (CFI), membrane cofactor protein (MCP), or complement factor H (CFH) may increase risk of disease recurrence after discontinuation of therapy; hence caution should be exercised while considering cessation among these patient subgroups per findings from the first study reviewed.
  • The third document suggests that terminal complement inhibition using drugs like Ultomiris appears beneficial for patients suffering from atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome based on low-quality evidence drawn from five single-arm studies compared against historical data but calls for further research given high bias potential inherent within non-randomized trials design employed so far.